Paul Newman
Pros:He was a big time star in the 50’s and 60’s and by the 80’s he was already nominated 6 times at the Oscars winning once for best actor. Not only is he a great actor but a great humanitarian. Might have the best blue eyes in Hollywood, he uses them to his full advantage showing great intense emotions.
Cons:Has not made anything great for about 20 years. He is way past his prime. Never showcased his full potential because he really didn’t hit his stride until his 40’s.

Robert Duvall
Pros:A very intense actor since the 60’s. A great character actor. Won many awards in acting as well as directing.
Cons: Always shined in supporting roles, rarely does he drive a film by himself. Has had a hard time finding great roles. Never really became a real movie star.
My Verdict
Two old timers go at it. The better actor here is clearly Robert Duvall. He has proved himself time after time and his intensity can not be matched by Newman who is cool, and charming but on a acting level does not match Duvall. However, since my vote does not matter, this point is mute. To vote just leave a comment. Feel free to vote for the other three match ups. After this quarterfinal round, there will be 4 actors left.